36th Annual Sonoma County Environmental Awards Dinner, Saturday, March 3, 2012

Sonoma County Conservation Council and Sierra Club Sonoma Group’s

36th Annual Sonoma County Environmental Awards Dinner

Building Healthy, Just &

Sustainable Communities

IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Paloma Pavel, PhD, President of Earth House Center

and Executive Director of Breakthrough Communities

 Saturday, March 3, 2012

Sebastopol Veterans’ Auditorium, 5:30 – 9:00pm

282 South High Street, Sebastopol

 MC: Leticia Romero, Vice-President, North Bay Organizing Project and

Community Organizer, Committee for Immigrant Rights Sonoma County

                                                 2012 Environmental Awards

Nominations open until 2/6 midnight: www.envirocentersoco.org/awards

Silent Auction and Raffle

Gourmet Dinner: A La Heart Catering

Tickets: $40, after 2/20: $50

Students with ID: $25, after 2/20: $30

Non-Profit Group Discount: 5 tickets for the price of 4, $160 until 2/20

Tickets: www.envirocentersoco.org

or send a check payable to SCCC to: PO Box 4346, Santa Rosa, CA 95402

Posted in Watershed Related Concerns | Leave a comment

Communicate With Water Words That Work, February 1, 2012

Communicate With Water Words That Work

February 1, 2012  ||  8:30 a.m. – 3:30 p.m.

835 Market Street, San Francisco

This workshop is designed for people who need to communicate with public audiences about water resources, coastal and watershed management, and land conservation.

Are you tired of struggling with environmental message design and delivery? Would you like to learn what words work when communicating about water and coastal issues? Then attend Communicate With Water Words that Work on February 1st and let communication expert Eric Eckl show you how to make a splash with your communications!

For those trained in different disciplines, environmental communications for everyday citizens can be a frustrating challenge, but the Water Words That Work message method makes it much easier to succeed. It’s designed to turn those blank stares into nodding heads — to turn passive “environmental awareness” into pro-environmental behavior.

Workshop Overview

8:45     Sign in and refreshments

9:00     Morning Session:  Water Words That Work

Make a splash with your communications! Relearn the language that everyday citizens use and you’ll become more confident and successful as you set out to enlighten the uninformed and persuade the undecided to take a stand or take action on behalf of our rivers, lakes, and oceans. The Water Words That Work environmental message method is a four-step process for transforming professional language into action language that will help make your next fundraising, issue advocacy, and behavior change campaign a success.

12:15    Networking Lunch (provided)

1:15     Afternoon Session:  Combat Communications for Conservationists

Conservation and controversy go hand in hand. Sooner or later, the mud will fly and your work and your reputation will be on the line. In this training, you will hone messaging skills you need to set the record straight and come out on top!

To register

Reserve your spot online:  http://www.sfbaynerr.org/ctp/programs/program_detail.php?PROGID=CoVYY2X .  Registration closes on January 20th or as soon as space fills.

About the instructor

Eric Eckl has over 15 year experience planning and carrying out behavior change campaigns, fundraising and issue advocacy.  His “Water Words That Work” approach is a highly successful workshop series, and he is a sought-after speaker for environmental, marketing, and technology conferences.

Participants in this workshop have said …
“Eric’s passion for people and communications is evident in the work he does, touching on issues that matter to most of us. He is a great teacher and presenter. Anyone who attends his workshop sessions will walk away excited and ready to implement what he has clearly explained, with an ‘I can do this’ attitude.”

For more information

Contact Marina Psaros, Coastal Training Program Coordinator at mpsaros@sfsu.edu

Posted in Watershed Related Concerns | Leave a comment

Mercury in the Water

Mercury has been a high priority pollutant in the Sac River Watershed for many years with TMDL’s and a number of cleanups.  I’ve always wondered why the North Coast Board has not done likewise.  The Russian River receives the contribution of the many abandoned mines in the Geyser’s District as well as that lovely relic on Sweetwater Springs.  Is there any history of anyone looking at these and their legacy impacts?  Oh yes, and we shouldn’t forget the Scaggs Springs district, now upstream of and inundated by Lake Sonoma.  Thanks,
Ray
Not only the mercury in fog is of interest …
have a fine day,
Rue
The State Water Resources Control Board is developing a Statewide Mercury Program to reduce mercury in California’s waters. It is expected that the following two elements will be part of the program:
- New water quality objectives for mercury in the tissues of fish that humans and wildlife eat.
- A policy or plan to reduce mercury in our state’s reservoirs to attain the new water quality objectives and protect both humans and wildlife that eat reservoir fish. The policy or plan may include provisions for responsible parties to initiate actions to help address mercury reservoir problems.
Posted in Environmental Impacts, Salmonid/Wildlife Impacts, Streams and Wetlands Impacts, Watershed Related Concerns | Leave a comment

DWR’s online groundwater information system

DWR’s online groundwater information system

http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/gama/geotracker_gama.shtml

GeoTracker GAMA is an online groundwater information system that gives you access to water quality data and connects you to groundwater basics and protection information.  This online database integrates groundwater quality data from multiple sources, which are searchable by chemical or location with results displayed on an interactive Google maps interface. To access GeoTracker GAMA, click here and enter an address in the search box .

SEARCH BY ADDRESS: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/

GeoTracker GAMA has data from over 200,000 discrete well locations, including over 100 million analytical results, well logs and water levels – since quality and quantity are both important factors in evaluating the state of our groundwater resources.

A - SHALLOW WELLS: Typically placed in first encountered groundwater – such as monitoring wells at regulated cleanup sites, or private domestic wells (GAMA Domestic Well Project).B - INTERMEDIATE WELLS: Deeper than shallow wells, and typically tap deeper aquifers – such as water supply wells (GAMA Domestic Well Project, GAMA Special Studies Project (LLNL), DPR and DWR).

C- DEEP WELLS: Typically hundreds to thousands of feet deep, pumping large volumes of water from deeper aquifers – such as  water supply wells used for public supply (GAMA Priority Basin Project (USGS), CA Dept of Public Health, DWR, GAMA Special Studies (LLNL), DPR), and irrigation wells used for agricultural purposes.

Note: Monitoring of public drinking water quality is the responsibility of the California Department of Public Health. The State of California does not regulate water quality in private domestic wells.

GeoTracker GAMA currently integrates data from State and Regional Water Boards, California Department of Public Health, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Department of Water Resources, US Geological Survey, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Posted in Groundwater Impacts | 1 Comment

Researchers find high levels of mercury in California’s coastal fog

By Christopher Stolz, Special to the Star

December 10, 2011

A research team at UC Santa Cruz that this year for the first time tested coastal fog in California for mercury found raised levels of the element.

Costal Fog

The team, led by chemist Peter Weiss-Penzias, reported finding “very high” levels of mercury, a neurotoxin, in the fog, according to a paper presented Thursday to a geophysical science conference in San Francisco on Thursday.

“These are unheard of levels for methylmercury,” said Weiss-Penzias. “People have measured methylmercury downstream from old mercury mines, where the bugs [microbes] have to convert inorganic mercury in sediment into methylmercury, and the highest levels they found were four parts per trillion. Well, our highest levels were 10 parts per trillion.”

Continue reading

Posted in Coastal Impacts, Environmental Impacts | Leave a comment

Human-created mercury vapor rises to upper atmosphere, circles globe multiple times, lands on Earth, ends up in fish: UW study

December 18, 2011 by Stone Hearth News Newswise — Humans pump thousands of tons of vapor from the metallic element mercury into the atmosphere each year, and it can remain suspended for long periods before being changed into a form that is easily removed from the atmosphere.

New research shows that the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere work to transform elemental mercury into oxidized mercury, which can easily be deposited into aquatic ecosystems and ultimately enter the food chain.

“The upper atmosphere is acting as a chemical reactor to make the mercury more able to be deposited to ecosystems,” said Seth Lyman, who did the work as a research assistant professor in science and technology at the University of Washington Bothell.

Continue reading

Posted in Coastal Impacts, Environmental Impacts | Leave a comment

Drought year?

On the Garcia we are having trouble with poaching. Big time poaching – with fencing across the river to act as gill nets – with multiple locations along the river. Done at night.

This can help ruin your coho run – especially during drought.

Helpful insights on rainfall predictions and the role of predation in species health.

Stephen
From: FISH1IFR@aol.com

To: omni@mcn.org, Discussion@lists.mcn.org CC: ncwaternet@lists.mcn.org, environment@lists.mcn.org Sent: 1/8/2012 1:30:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time Subj: Re: [NCWaterNet] [MCN-Discussion]- sea lions & water year worries

Just two observations:
(1) sea lion predation on incoming salmon runs is normal, and indicates a healthy ecosystem — salmon advocates may have to gulp a couple of times when they see “all the sea lions” at the mouth of the Klamath River just lining up for their salmon lunch, but this is what sea lions do — eat salmon
– at the mouth of the Klamath River. Even at its most, however, the

“huge numbers” of sea lions some people complain about can only eat a very small fraction of the incoming adult spawners….. and this type of predation is, of course, part of the competition in the wild that keeps salmon evolving and improving as a species in its abilities to evade these predators, improving the stocks.

(2) It is too early to seriously worry about whether this will be a drought year yet. This year is still following the classic La Nina-type weather patterns as predicted — very dry December and VERY WET early months or 2012 well into April. But of course, every water-year is a white-knuckle ride! This is especially true since most of our “predictor” models are based on average year rainfall patterns, not La Nina or El Nino pattern extremes… but of course, “average” is a mathematical fiction, not a real event in most years.

But I would not be terribly concerned about 2012 being a dry or critically dry water year until we have seen what rainfall January brings. And even then, its all a game based on playing the odd (which among scientists are more politely called “exceedence levels”). If January is also critically dry then we are much more certain to be in trouble for the rest of this year. But even now there is contingency planning in process, as is always wise, for worst cases. As they say in the Middle East, “Trust in God, but always tie your camel.”

— Glen Spain

In a message dated 1/7/2012 9:57:39 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, omni@mcn.org writes:
Excellent insight Scott This could be pretty tragic – no rain is expected for couple of weeks. We may be seeing a dramatic reduction in this winter run and a reduction in salmon in many of our rivers. Anyone have helpful thoughts on this? ~BC

Posted in Water Conservation Issue | Comments Off

I do not see the forests as a net user from evapotranspiration.

Depending the type of forest (rain forest, Temperate rain forest, etc.)
what percent of precipitation is taken up by evapotranspiration. I
imagine it depends on many factors (i.e. Slope, soils, frequency and
duration of hydrologic events, type of veg, etc.)

On thing for sure, there is degradation of water quality values related
to deforestation and/or vegetative cover loss. How are they measuring that?
This deals with one of the themes in our book.

J

True.  Except CalFire says the Casper Creek study says different. I think they are misusing the study.

The role of roots for holding runoff on slopes so that it
percolates deeper is generally ignored. But all studies show that
forested slopes slow runoff and reduce the level of flooding
downstream.

Jane

Water and trees:

Stephen

Posted in Watershed Related Concerns | Comments Off

Russian River Storm-Watershed Café

Good morning, Russian River Watershed Community

The Russian River Storm-Watershed Café has been rescheduled for January 26, 2012, 10:00 am to noon, at the Healdsburg Community Center Library, 1557 Healdsburg Ave., Healdsburg.  We look forward to receiving renewed interest from those of you who signed up in November, and wider interest from those of you whose calendars were already booked!

You are receiving this invitation because we would like to hear your successful public outreach stories and experiences, which can serve as inspiration in formulating an enhanced outreach program for stormwater management within our Russian River watershed.

To confirm reservation of the space, we must receive an RSVP from you by January 12th.  Please let us know that you plan to join us to share the wealth of your own experience in community outreach!  Give us a call at (707) 823.2324 if you have questions, or email me atsherry@econca.com.

Healdsburg’s Foss Creek Community Center:

1557 Healdsburg Ave
Healdsburg, CA 95448

The workshop will be modeled upon the “World Café” concept, where participants are engaged to carry ideas or themes from table to table, sharing experiences, exchanging perspectives and building on each other’s, to come up with new insights in which all parties have a stake.  The workshop will begin with focused outreach success stories from a variety of community organizers and successful project proponents.  Each table will then focus on priority issues of interest, using concrete examples. 

Sherry Pimsler – RRWA Staff

sherry@econca.com

tel.(707)823.2324

Posted in Watershed Related Concerns | Comments Off

Global Forests Are Overlooked as Water Suppliers, Study Shows

ScienceDaily (Dec. 15, 2011) — The forests of the world supply a significant amount of moisture that creates rain. A new study published in Global Change Biology reveals how this important contribution of forests to the hydrologic cycle is often overlooked in water resource policy, such as that of the EU.

The study, by David Ellison, Martyn Futter and Kevin Bishop at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), shows that reducing forest area reduces regional and continental rainfall. This needs to be recognized to obtain a fair picture of the forest role in the hydrologic cycle.

“Are forests good for water? An apparently simple question divides scientists in two camps — those who see trees as demanding water and those who see trees as supplying water,” said David Ellison who works in the Future Forests research program studying resource management. “This paper demonstrates that the difference between these two camps has to do with the spatial scale being considered.”

From a local perspective, a tree is a consumer of water. But on a broader regional scale, forests supply the atmosphere with moisture that will become rainfall. Some dry areas depend almost entirely on rain that comes from forest-covered areas via the atmosphere. The view of forests as a consumer of water influences the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) which includes strategies for water pricing, but fails to consider the contribution of forests to the water cycle. The same goes for the increasingly popular “Water Footprint,” a tool developed to communicate the water usage of a product or process.

Deforestation and land conversion from forest to agriculture or urbanization will have a negative effect on regional precipitation. On a small scale and in the short run it may not be noticeable. But if the loss of forests continues, there is a risk that both rainfall and water supply will decrease in many places. Afforestation and reforestation on the other hand could be used as an invaluable climate change adaptation tool to bring increasing moisture to regions where rainfall is on the decline.

David Ellison argues for the need to change the basic view about the importance of forests in the hydrologic cycle in a new article in the influential journal Global Change Biology. “Forests, whose contribution to the water cycle is crucial for human survival and future well being, should be regarded as a global public good, to be preserved and used for the benefit of all.”

The Future Forests research programme produces research on which to base strategies for the sustainable use of boreal forests. Future Forests is a Mistra programme, hosted by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). It is a joint initiative between SLU, Umeå University and the Forestry Reserach Institute of Sweden.

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Water Conservation Issue | Comments Off